I wish in the city of your heartyou would let me be the streetwhere you walk when you are mostyourself. I imagine the houses:It has been raining, but the rainis done and the children kept homehave begun opening their doors.
Someone pouring lightOut of the window.The roses of airOpen.And childrenPlaying in the streetLook up.Pigeons nibbleAt its sweetness.Girls are beautifulAnd men gentleIn this light.But before the others say soSomeone shutsThe window again.
Except that this is the tragic moment -- a moment just as photographic, photographic meaning here light written down, just as photographic as the first -- but the moment of closing up and closing off, not of opening. And so I cannot love this second poem exactly as I love the first poem. Both poems though are stories I live. And I do love them both. So then I would have to explain that to understand either of these two and to understand my love for them, the key is a third poem, "Lindenbloom" by Amy Clampitt:
Before midsummer densityopaques with shade the checker-
tables underneath, in daylight
unleafing lindens burn
green-gold a day or two,
no more, with intimations
of an essence I saw once,
in what had been the pleasure-
garden of the popes
at Avignon, dishevel
into half (or possibly three-
quarters of) a million
hanging, intricately
tactile, blond bell-pulls
of bloom, the in-mid-air
resort of honeybees’
hirsute cotillion
teasing by the milligram
out of those necklaced
nectaries, aromas
so intensely subtle,
strollers passing under
looked up confused,
as though they’d just
heard voices, or
inhaled the ghost
of derelict splendor
and/or of seraphs shaken
into pollen dust
no transubstantiating
pope or antipope could sift
or quite precisely ponder.
And surely that must make everything utterly clear.


1 comment:
Well, I had not read a single one of these poems, and while I could not exactly explain how each provides a key into understanding why you loved the other two, I think I *do* understand, nonetheless. Thank you for these poems.
Post a Comment